← ERAS statistics, all specialties
Urology ERAS statistics 2027

Urology Has 19% More Applicants Than Four Years Ago

On the day programs opened ERAS 2027 applications, 635 people had applied to urology, against 534 at the same point of ERAS 2023. Programs interviewed 39% of the applicants who signaled them and 2% of those who didn't.

By Rezumab · Data as of

That is a 19% increase, comparing the same day of each cycle. Of the 20 specialties with at least 300 applicants, 17 grew; urology had the 11th-largest increase. Over full seasons, the change from ERAS 2023 to 2026 was +8%. By applicant type, the same-day change since ERAS 2023 was +20% for MDs, +30% for DOs and +3% for international graduates.

Below are five seasons of AAMC ERAS data for urology: who applies, how many applications they send, how signals are used and how often programs interviewed applicants who did and didn’t signal them, split by MD, DO and international medical graduate.

Applicants
635
+8.5% vs. last year
Applications
27,238
+3.1% vs. last year
Median apps each
37
5.1% vs. last year
Applicants by type: MD 497 (+13.2%) · DO 78 (+13.0%) · Intl. 60 (−22.1%)
ERAS 2027 so far, against the same day of ERAS 2026

The MD share of applicants fell 3 points

Full-season applicants rose 8% from ERAS 2023 to 2026
Applicants by type, completed ERAS seasons. Anyone who sent the specialty at least one application.
0200400600ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026MD 442Intl. graduates 92DO 73
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

In ERAS 2026, 607 people applied to urology. The pool was 72.8% MD, 12% DO and 15.2% international graduates. 65.4% applied to no other specialty, a count that treats required preliminary and transitional years as another specialty.

Applicants are up 8.5% from the same day last year

Applicants fell in one of the last four years
Change in urology applicants from the same day a year earlier, by type; last column is all applications
Urology year-over-year change
SeasonAllMDDOIntl. gradsApplications
ERAS 2027so far, vs. same day of 2026+8.5%+13.2%+13.0%−22.1%+3.1%
ERAS 2026vs. 2025+5.2%+1.9%+21.1%+13.2%−11.2%
ERAS 2025vs. 2024+5.5%+12.5%−12.3%−13.9%−15.1%
ERAS 2024vs. 2023−1.3%−7.9%+8.3%+36.2%−25.2%
Note: Same-day counts for every season, so the in-progress year compares fairly. A dash means fewer than 50 applicants in the earlier year, or a season when the specialty was only partly in ERAS.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

The median applicant sends 40 applications, down from 88

Every applicant type is sending fewer applications
Median applications per applicant to urology
0255075100Signals begin (30)ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026ERAS 2027DO 40MD 37Intl. graduates 32.5
Note: ERAS 2027 (hollow markers) is as of September 23, 2026.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

By type in ERAS 2026: MDs 40, DOs 37, international graduates 36. The middle half of applicants sent between 31 and 53. The overall median is the eighth highest of 23 specialties covered here.

On the programs’ side, the median urology program received 111 applications in ERAS 2026, against 70 in ERAS 2023.

Most applicants a program sees have signaled it

In ERAS 2027, 99% of urology applicants used signals, and the median signaling applicant used 30.

At the median program, 67% of applicants had signaled it, up from 61% in ERAS 2026. The median program received 122 signals; the busiest tenth received 170 or more.

Signals per applicant by season: 2026: 30 · 2027: 30.

See which urology programs a signal moves most.

Without a signal, interviews are rare

Signaled applicants were interviewed at 39%; those who didn't signal, 2%
Median program's interview rate by signal and applicant type, ERAS 2026 (30 signals)
Did not signalSignaled
0%25%50%75%100%
All applicants
63 programs
39%
MD
63 programs
46%
DO
63 programs
22%
Intl. graduates
63 programs
7%
Show as table
Did not signalSignaled
All applicants2%39%
MD2%46%
DO0%22%
Intl. graduates0%7%
Note: 63 programs reported interview offers and met the AAMC's threshold of 7 invited applicants per PGY-1 position. Each dot is the median program's own rate. A missing applicant type was suppressed by the AAMC (under 50 applicants).
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

41% of urology programs interviewed no one who hadn’t signaled them. At 98% of programs, signaled applicants were interviewed at a higher rate than those who didn’t signal. With rates this low, applications beyond an applicant’s signals rarely turn into interviews.

These are last season’s rates. Track who is sending urology interview invites this season.

A DO's signal returns 47% of what an MD's does; an international graduate's, 15%

An MD who signaled an urology program was interviewed at 46% of the median program, the eighth lowest of 21 specialties with interview data. For DOs, urology ranks the third least DO-friendly of 16.

An international graduate who signaled (7%) did better than an MD who didn’t (2%), one of the few specialties where that holds.

These are outcomes by group, not the effect of belonging to one. The groups differ in exam timing, visa needs and U.S. clinical experience, and none of that is controlled here.

The most common backup is general surgery, chosen by 13%

Also applied to, ERAS 2026Share of applicants
General Surgery (preliminary)PGY-1 year20%
General Surgery (categorical)13%
Internal Medicine (categorical)11%
Family Medicine6%
Internal Medicine (primary care)4%
Internal Medicine (preliminary)PGY-1 year4%

Rows marked PGY-1 year are preliminary and transitional programs, which specialties that start at PGY-2 require. Categorical programs in another specialty are the real backup plan.