← ERAS statistics, all specialties
Neurology ERAS statistics 2027

Neurology Has 20% More Applicants Than Four Years Ago

On the day programs opened ERAS 2027 applications, 2,306 people had applied to neurology, against 1,925 at the same point of ERAS 2023. Programs interviewed 38% of the applicants who signaled them and 8% of those who didn't.

By Rezumab · Data as of

That is a 20% increase, comparing the same day of each cycle. Of the 20 specialties with at least 300 applicants, 17 grew; neurology had the ninth-largest increase. Over full seasons, the change from ERAS 2023 to 2026 was +20%. By applicant type, the same-day change since ERAS 2023 was +38% for MDs, +30% for DOs and +5% for international graduates.

Below are five seasons of AAMC ERAS data for neurology: who applies, how many applications they send, how signals are used and how often programs interviewed applicants who did and didn’t signal them, split by MD, DO and international medical graduate.

Applicants
2,306
8.2% vs. last year
Applications
111,031
11.0% vs. last year
Median apps each
40
+2.6% vs. last year
Applicants by type: MD 935 (+5.1%) · DO 331 (−1.8%) · Intl. 1,040 (−19.0%)
ERAS 2027 so far, against the same day of ERAS 2026

The international-graduate share of applicants fell 4 points

Full-season applicants rose 20% from ERAS 2023 to 2026
Applicants by type, completed ERAS seasons. Anyone who sent the specialty at least one application.
05001,0001,5002,000ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026Intl. graduates 1,596MD 926DO 359
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

In ERAS 2026, 2,881 people applied to neurology. The pool was 32.1% MD, 12.5% DO and 55.4% international graduates. 11.7% applied to no other specialty, a count that treats required preliminary and transitional years as another specialty.

Applicants are down 8.2% from the same day last year

Applicants fell in one of the last four years
Change in neurology applicants from the same day a year earlier, by type; last column is all applications
Neurology year-over-year change
SeasonAllMDDOIntl. gradsApplications
ERAS 2027so far, vs. same day of 2026−8.2%+5.1%−1.8%−19.0%−11.0%
ERAS 2026vs. 2025+13.6%+13.2%+17.8%+12.7%+6.7%
ERAS 2025vs. 2024+9.1%+9.6%+9.6%+8.7%+6.8%
ERAS 2024vs. 2023+5.2%+5.9%+2.8%+5.4%+8.1%
Note: Same-day counts for every season, so the in-progress year compares fairly. A dash means fewer than 50 applicants in the earlier year, or a season when the specialty was only partly in ERAS.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

The median applicant sends 35 applications, down from 36

Applications per applicant, by type
Median applications per applicant to neurology
0204060Signals 3 → 8ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026ERAS 2027DO 52Intl. graduates 39.5MD 36
Note: ERAS 2027 (hollow markers) is as of September 23, 2026.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

By type in ERAS 2026: MDs 35, DOs 54, international graduates 30. The middle half of applicants sent between 17 and 65. The overall median is the 11th highest of 23 specialties covered here.

On the programs’ side, the median neurology program received 520 applications in ERAS 2026, against 486 in ERAS 2023.

Most applications still arrive without a signal

In ERAS 2027, 99% of neurology applicants used signals, and the median signaling applicant used 8.

At the median program, 14% of applicants had signaled it, up from 13% in ERAS 2026. The median program received 79 signals; the busiest tenth received 166 or more.

Signals per applicant by season: 2024: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2026: 8 · 2027: 8.

See which neurology programs a signal moves most.

A signal multiplies the interview rate about 5-fold

Signaled applicants were interviewed at 38%; those who didn't signal, 8%
Median program's interview rate by signal and applicant type, ERAS 2026 (8 signals)
Did not signalSignaled
0%25%50%75%100%
All applicants
167 programs
38%
MD
167 programs
64%
DO
167 programs
50%
Intl. graduates
167 programs
13%
Show as table
Did not signalSignaled
All applicants8%38%
MD20%64%
DO7%50%
Intl. graduates2%13%
Note: 167 programs reported interview offers and met the AAMC's threshold of 7 invited applicants per PGY-1 position. Each dot is the median program's own rate. A missing applicant type was suppressed by the AAMC (under 50 applicants).
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

At 97% of programs, signaled applicants were interviewed at a higher rate than those who didn’t signal.

These are last season’s rates. Track who is sending neurology interview invites this season.

A DO's signal returns 78% of what an MD's does; an international graduate's, 21%

An MD who signaled a neurology program was interviewed at 64% of the median program, the eighth highest of 21 specialties with interview data. For DOs, neurology ranks the eighth most DO-friendly of 16.

An international graduate who signaled (13%) still did worse than an MD who didn’t (20%).

These are outcomes by group, not the effect of belonging to one. The groups differ in exam timing, visa needs and U.S. clinical experience, and none of that is controlled here.

The most common backup is internal medicine, chosen by 43%

Also applied to, ERAS 2026Share of applicants
Internal Medicine (preliminary)PGY-1 year60%
Internal Medicine (categorical)43%
Transitional YearPGY-1 year29%
Internal Medicine (primary care)25%
Family Medicine24%
Pediatrics11%

Rows marked PGY-1 year are preliminary and transitional programs, which specialties that start at PGY-2 require. Categorical programs in another specialty are the real backup plan.