← ERAS statistics, all specialties
Interventional Radiology (Integrated) ERAS statistics 2027

Interventional Radiology (Integrated) Has 43% More Applicants Than Four Years Ago

On the day programs opened ERAS 2027 applications, 560 people had applied to interventional radiology, against 393 at the same point of ERAS 2023. Programs interviewed 50% of the applicants who signaled them and 20% of those who didn't.

By Rezumab · Data as of

That is a 43% increase, comparing the same day of each cycle. Of the 20 specialties with at least 300 applicants, 17 grew; interventional radiology had the largest increase. Over full seasons, the change from ERAS 2023 to 2026 was +29%. By applicant type, the same-day change since ERAS 2023 was +43% for MDs, +30% for DOs and +51% for international graduates.

Below are five seasons of AAMC ERAS data for interventional radiology: who applies, how many applications they send, how signals are used and how often programs interviewed applicants who did and didn’t signal them, split by MD, DO and international medical graduate.

Applicants
560
+17.9% vs. last year
Applications
20,631
+26.0% vs. last year
Median apps each
34
+13.3% vs. last year
Applicants by type: MD 327 (+21.1%) · DO 96 (+41.2%) · Intl. 137 (0.0%)
ERAS 2027 so far, against the same day of ERAS 2026

The international-graduate share of applicants rose 7 points

Full-season applicants rose 29% from ERAS 2023 to 2026
Applicants by type, completed ERAS seasons. Anyone who sent the specialty at least one application.
0100200300ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026MD 299Intl. graduates 197DO 83
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

In ERAS 2026, 579 people applied to interventional radiology. The pool was 51.6% MD, 14.3% DO and 34% international graduates. 0.7% applied to no other specialty, a count that treats required preliminary and transitional years as another specialty.

Applicants are up 17.9% from the same day last year

Applicants rose every year
Change in interventional radiology applicants from the same day a year earlier, by type; last column is all applications
Interventional Radiology (Integrated) year-over-year change
SeasonAllMDDOIntl. gradsApplications
ERAS 2027so far, vs. same day of 2026+17.9%+21.1%+41.2%0.0%+26.0%
ERAS 2026vs. 2025+3.7%+0.7%+7.9%+7.9%−3.4%
ERAS 2025vs. 2024+7.5%+10.7%−28.4%+32.3%+2.0%
ERAS 2024vs. 2023+8.4%+6.1%+18.9%+5.5%+17.7%
Note: Same-day counts for every season, so the in-progress year compares fairly. A dash means fewer than 50 applicants in the earlier year, or a season when the specialty was only partly in ERAS.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

The median applicant sends 27 applications, down from 29

Applications per applicant, by type
Median applications per applicant to interventional radiology
010203040Signals 12 → 8ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026ERAS 2027MD 38Intl. graduates 30DO 28
Note: ERAS 2027 (hollow markers) is as of September 23, 2026.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

By type in ERAS 2026: MDs 36, DOs 24, international graduates 9. The middle half of applicants sent between 8 and 46. The overall median is the fifth lowest of 23 specialties covered here.

On the programs’ side, the median interventional radiology program received 129 applications in ERAS 2026, against 128 in ERAS 2023.

About 20% of a program's applicants signal it

In ERAS 2027, 99% of interventional radiology applicants used signals, and the median signaling applicant used 8.

At the median program, 19% of applicants had signaled it, up from 20% in ERAS 2026. The median program received 36 signals; the busiest tenth received 67 or more.

Signals per applicant by season: 2024: 6 (gold), 9 (silver) · 2025: 6 (gold), 6 (silver) · 2026: 8 · 2027: 8.

Unsignaled applicants still get interviews

Signaled applicants were interviewed at 50%; those who didn't signal, 20%
Median program's interview rate by signal and applicant type, ERAS 2026 (8 signals)
Did not signalSignaled
0%25%50%75%100%
All applicants
83 programs
50%
MD
83 programs
70%
DO
83 programs
50%
Intl. graduates
83 programs
0%
Show as table
Did not signalSignaled
All applicants20%50%
MD27%70%
DO12%50%
Intl. graduates0%0%
Note: 83 programs reported interview offers and met the AAMC's threshold of 10 invited applicants per PGY-1 position. Each dot is the median program's own rate. A missing applicant type was suppressed by the AAMC (under 50 applicants).
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

At 88% of programs, signaled applicants were interviewed at a higher rate than those who didn’t signal. Applying beyond your signals still pays in interventional radiology; a signal raises the odds but isn’t required.

These are last season’s rates. Track who is sending interventional radiology interview invites this season.

A DO's signal returns 71% of what an MD's does; international graduates who signaled were rarely interviewed

An MD who signaled an interventional radiology program was interviewed at 70% of the median program, the fifth highest of 21 specialties with interview data. For DOs, interventional radiology ranks the seventh least DO-friendly of 16.

An international graduate who signaled (0%) still did worse than an MD who didn’t (27%).

These are outcomes by group, not the effect of belonging to one. The groups differ in exam timing, visa needs and U.S. clinical experience, and none of that is controlled here.

The most common backup is diagnostic radiology, chosen by 89%

Also applied to, ERAS 2026Share of applicants
Diagnostic Radiology89%
Transitional YearPGY-1 year62%
General Surgery (preliminary)PGY-1 year53%
Internal Medicine (preliminary)PGY-1 year49%
Internal Medicine (categorical)27%
Internal Medicine (primary care)14%

Rows marked PGY-1 year are preliminary and transitional programs, which specialties that start at PGY-2 require. Categorical programs in another specialty are the real backup plan.