← ERAS statistics, all specialties
Anesthesiology ERAS statistics 2027

Anesthesiology Has 15% More Applicants Than Four Years Ago

On the day programs opened ERAS 2027 applications, 3,856 people had applied to anesthesiology, against 3,364 at the same point of ERAS 2023. Programs interviewed 55% of the applicants who sent a gold signal and 0.7% of those who didn't.

By Rezumab · Data as of

That is a 15% increase, comparing the same day of each cycle. Of the 20 specialties with at least 300 applicants, 17 grew; anesthesiology had the 14th-largest increase. Over full seasons, the change from ERAS 2023 to 2026 was +4%. By applicant type, the same-day change since ERAS 2023 was +16% for MDs, +21% for DOs and +4% for international graduates.

Below are five seasons of AAMC ERAS data for anesthesiology: who applies, how many applications they send, how signals are used and how often programs interviewed applicants who did and didn’t signal them, split by MD, DO and international medical graduate.

Applicants
3,856
+9.6% vs. last year
Applications
129,958
1.8% vs. last year
Median apps each
27
10.0% vs. last year
Applicants by type: MD 2,400 (+11.9%) · DO 820 (+20.9%) · Intl. 636 (−8.5%)
ERAS 2027 so far, against the same day of ERAS 2026

The mix of MD, DO and international applicants has barely changed

Full-season applicants rose 4% from ERAS 2023 to 2026
Applicants by type, completed ERAS seasons. Anyone who sent the specialty at least one application.
01,0002,0003,000ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026MD 2,226Intl. graduates 822DO 713
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

In ERAS 2026, 3,761 people applied to anesthesiology. The pool was 59.2% MD, 19% DO and 21.9% international graduates. 20.8% applied to no other specialty, a count that treats required preliminary and transitional years as another specialty.

Applicants are up 9.6% from the same day last year

Applicants fell in one of the last four years
Change in anesthesiology applicants from the same day a year earlier, by type; last column is all applications
Anesthesiology year-over-year change
SeasonAllMDDOIntl. gradsApplications
ERAS 2027so far, vs. same day of 2026+9.6%+11.9%+20.9%−8.5%−1.8%
ERAS 2026vs. 2025+3.4%−0.7%+4.6%+17.0%−19.5%
ERAS 2025vs. 2024−0.2%+3.6%−10.9%−0.3%−20.1%
ERAS 2024vs. 2023+1.3%+0.5%+7.2%−2.6%−8.6%
Note: Same-day counts for every season, so the in-progress year compares fairly. A dash means fewer than 50 applicants in the earlier year, or a season when the specialty was only partly in ERAS.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

The median applicant sends 30 applications, down from 60

Every applicant type is sending fewer applications
Median applications per applicant to anesthesiology
0255075100Signals begin (15)ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026ERAS 2027Intl. graduates 33DO 31MD 24
Note: ERAS 2027 (hollow markers) is as of September 23, 2026.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

By type in ERAS 2026: MDs 27, DOs 36, international graduates 34.5. The middle half of applicants sent between 18 and 48. The overall median is the ninth lowest of 23 specialties covered here.

On the programs’ side, the median anesthesiology program received 559 applications in ERAS 2026, against 873 in ERAS 2023.

About 40% of a program's applicants signal it

In ERAS 2027, 100% of anesthesiology applicants used gold signals, and the median signaling applicant used 5 gold and 10 silver.

At the median program, 43% of applicants had signaled it, up from 36% in ERAS 2026. The median program received 285 signals; the busiest tenth received 479 or more.

Signals per applicant by season: 2024: 5 (gold), 10 (silver) · 2025: 5 (gold), 10 (silver) · 2026: 5 (gold), 10 (silver) · 2027: 5 (gold), 10 (silver).

See which anesthesiology programs a signal moves most.

Without a signal, interviews are rare

Gold-signal applicants were interviewed at 55%; those who didn't signal, 0.7%
Median program's interview rate by signal and applicant type, ERAS 2026 (5 (gold), 10 (silver) signals)
Did not signalSilver signalGold signal
0%25%50%75%100%
All applicants
157 programs
55%
MD
157 programs
67%
DO
157 programs
59%
Intl. graduates
157 programs
15%
Show as table
Did not signalSilver signalGold signal
All applicants0.7%32%55%
MD1%43%67%
DO0%25%59%
Intl. graduates0%3%15%
Note: 157 programs reported interview offers and met the AAMC's threshold of 5 invited applicants per PGY-1 position. Each dot is the median program's own rate. A missing applicant type was suppressed by the AAMC (under 50 applicants).
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

22% of anesthesiology programs interviewed no one who hadn’t signaled them. At 100% of programs, signaled applicants were interviewed at a higher rate than those who didn’t signal. With rates this low, applications beyond an applicant’s signals rarely turn into interviews.

These are last season’s rates. Track who is sending anesthesiology interview invites this season.

A DO's signal returns 88% of what an MD's does; an international graduate's, 23%

An MD who signaled an anesthesiology program was interviewed at 67% of the median program, the seventh highest of 21 specialties with interview data. For DOs, anesthesiology ranks the fourth most DO-friendly of 16.

An international graduate who signaled (15%) did better than an MD who didn’t (1%), one of the few specialties where that holds.

These are outcomes by group, not the effect of belonging to one. The groups differ in exam timing, visa needs and U.S. clinical experience, and none of that is controlled here.

The most common backup is internal medicine, chosen by 23%

Also applied to, ERAS 2026Share of applicants
Transitional YearPGY-1 year50%
Internal Medicine (preliminary)PGY-1 year49%
Internal Medicine (categorical)23%
General Surgery (preliminary)PGY-1 year10%
Internal Medicine (primary care)10%
Family Medicine7%

Rows marked PGY-1 year are preliminary and transitional programs, which specialties that start at PGY-2 require. Categorical programs in another specialty are the real backup plan.