← ERAS statistics, all specialties
Pathology ERAS statistics 2027

Pathology Has 7% Fewer Applicants Than Four Years Ago

On the day programs opened ERAS 2027 applications, 1,155 people had applied to pathology, against 1,239 at the same point of ERAS 2023. Programs interviewed 38% of the applicants who signaled them and 9% of those who didn't.

By Rezumab · Data as of

That is a 7% decline, comparing the same day of each cycle. Of the 20 specialties with at least 300 applicants, three shrank; pathology had the second-steepest decline. Over full seasons, the change from ERAS 2023 to 2026 was −5%. By applicant type, the same-day change since ERAS 2023 was +17% for MDs, +35% for DOs and −23% for international graduates.

Below are five seasons of AAMC ERAS data for pathology: who applies, how many applications they send, how signals are used and how often programs interviewed applicants who did and didn’t signal them, split by MD, DO and international medical graduate.

Applicants
1,155
8.8% vs. last year
Applications
59,940
15.0% vs. last year
Median apps each
40
7.0% vs. last year
Applicants by type: MD 361 (−3.2%) · DO 181 (−4.2%) · Intl. 613 (−12.9%)
ERAS 2027 so far, against the same day of ERAS 2026

The international-graduate share of applicants fell 10 points

Full-season applicants fell 5% from ERAS 2023 to 2026
Applicants by type, completed ERAS seasons. Anyone who sent the specialty at least one application.
05001,0001,500ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026Intl. graduates 849MD 401DO 204
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

In ERAS 2026, 1,454 people applied to pathology. The pool was 27.6% MD, 14% DO and 58.4% international graduates. 62.2% applied to no other specialty, a count that treats required preliminary and transitional years as another specialty.

Applicants are down 8.8% from the same day last year

Applicants fell in two of the last four years
Change in pathology applicants from the same day a year earlier, by type; last column is all applications
Pathology year-over-year change
SeasonAllMDDOIntl. gradsApplications
ERAS 2027so far, vs. same day of 2026−8.8%−3.2%−4.2%−12.9%−15.0%
ERAS 2026vs. 2025+4.4%+10.0%+17.4%−1.3%+3.7%
ERAS 2025vs. 2024−4.2%−3.1%+12.6%−7.8%−2.9%
ERAS 2024vs. 2023+2.2%+13.6%+6.7%−3.0%+3.1%
Note: Same-day counts for every season, so the in-progress year compares fairly. A dash means fewer than 50 applicants in the earlier year, or a season when the specialty was only partly in ERAS.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

The median applicant sends 40 applications, up from 38

Applications per applicant, by type
Median applications per applicant to pathology
0204060Signals begin (5)ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026ERAS 2027Intl. graduates 59DO 45MD 30
Note: ERAS 2027 (hollow markers) is as of September 23, 2026.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

By type in ERAS 2026: MDs 30, DOs 43, international graduates 56. The middle half of applicants sent between 19 and 83. The overall median is the seventh highest of 23 specialties covered here.

On the programs’ side, the median pathology program received 245 applications in ERAS 2026, against 381 in ERAS 2023.

Most applications still arrive without a signal

In ERAS 2027, 99% of pathology applicants used signals, and the median signaling applicant used 5.

At the median program, 8% of applicants had signaled it, up from 8% in ERAS 2026. The median program received 37 signals; the busiest tenth received 79 or more.

Signals per applicant by season: 2024: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2026: 5 · 2027: 5.

See which pathology programs a signal moves most.

A signal multiplies the interview rate about 4-fold

Signaled applicants were interviewed at 38%; those who didn't signal, 9%
Median program's interview rate by signal and applicant type, ERAS 2026 (5 signals)
Did not signalSignaled
0%25%50%75%100%
All applicants
112 programs
38%
MD
112 programs
62%
DO
112 programs
54%
Intl. graduates
112 programs
20%
Show as table
Did not signalSignaled
All applicants9%38%
MD24%62%
DO13%54%
Intl. graduates3%20%
Note: 112 programs reported interview offers and met the AAMC's threshold of 7 invited applicants per PGY-1 position. Each dot is the median program's own rate. A missing applicant type was suppressed by the AAMC (under 50 applicants).
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

At 97% of programs, signaled applicants were interviewed at a higher rate than those who didn’t signal.

These are last season’s rates. Track who is sending pathology interview invites this season.

A DO's signal returns 88% of what an MD's does; an international graduate's, 33%

An MD who signaled a pathology program was interviewed at 62% of the median program, the 10th highest of 21 specialties with interview data. For DOs, pathology ranks the fifth most DO-friendly of 16.

An international graduate who signaled (20%) still did worse than an MD who didn’t (24%).

These are outcomes by group, not the effect of belonging to one. The groups differ in exam timing, visa needs and U.S. clinical experience, and none of that is controlled here.

The most common backup is internal medicine, chosen by 24%

Also applied to, ERAS 2026Share of applicants
Internal Medicine (categorical)24%
Family Medicine20%
Internal Medicine (primary care)15%
Internal Medicine (preliminary)PGY-1 year13%
Pediatrics10%
Transitional YearPGY-1 year9%

Rows marked PGY-1 year are preliminary and transitional programs, which specialties that start at PGY-2 require. Categorical programs in another specialty are the real backup plan.