← ERAS statistics, all specialties
Thoracic Surgery (Integrated) ERAS statistics 2027

Thoracic Surgery (Integrated) Has 13% More Applicants Than Four Years Ago

On the day programs opened ERAS 2027 applications, 199 people had applied to thoracic surgery, against 176 at the same point of ERAS 2023. Programs interviewed 30% of the applicants who signaled them and 22% of those who didn't.

By Rezumab · Data as of

Below are five seasons of AAMC ERAS data for thoracic surgery: who applies, how many applications they send, how signals are used and how often programs interviewed applicants who did and didn’t signal them, split by MD, DO and international medical graduate.

Applicants
199
+14.4% vs. last year
Applications
4,571
+8.3% vs. last year
Median apps each
28
6.7% vs. last year
Applicants by type: MD 118 (+14.6%) · DO 16 (too few to compare) · Intl. 65 (−1.5%)
ERAS 2027 so far, against the same day of ERAS 2026

The international-graduate share of applicants rose 4 points

Full-season applicant numbers held steady from ERAS 2023 to 2026
Applicants by type, completed ERAS seasons. Anyone who sent the specialty at least one application.
050100150ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026MD 108Intl. graduates 89DO 8
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

In ERAS 2026, 205 people applied to thoracic surgery. The pool was 52.7% MD, 3.9% DO and 43.4% international graduates. 3.4% applied to no other specialty, a count that treats required preliminary and transitional years as another specialty.

Applicants are up 14.4% from the same day last year

Applicants fell in one of the last four years
Change in thoracic surgery applicants from the same day a year earlier, by type; last column is all applications
Thoracic Surgery (Integrated) year-over-year change
SeasonAllMDDOIntl. gradsApplications
ERAS 2027so far, vs. same day of 2026+14.4%+14.6%−1.5%+8.3%
ERAS 2026vs. 2025−13.4%−13.4%−4.3%−14.1%
ERAS 2025vs. 2024+10.4%+12.3%+9.5%+15.3%
ERAS 2024vs. 2023+3.4%−3.6%+12.5%−2.7%
Note: Same-day counts for every season, so the in-progress year compares fairly. A dash means fewer than 50 applicants in the earlier year, or a season when the specialty was only partly in ERAS.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

The median applicant sends 25 applications, down from 30

Every applicant type is sending fewer applications
Median applications per applicant to thoracic surgery
010203040Signals 3 → 4ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026ERAS 2027MD 30DO 25.5Intl. graduates 15
Note: ERAS 2027 (hollow markers) is as of September 23, 2026.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

By type in ERAS 2026: MDs 31.5, DOs 10.5, international graduates 10. The middle half of applicants sent between 7 and 36. The overall median is the fourth lowest of 23 specialties covered here.

On the programs’ side, the median thoracic surgery program received 66 applications in ERAS 2026, against 90 in ERAS 2023.

Most applications still arrive without a signal

In ERAS 2027, 98% of thoracic surgery applicants used signals, and the median signaling applicant used 4.

At the median program, 15% of applicants had signaled it, up from 11% in ERAS 2026. The median program received 20 signals; the busiest tenth received 37 or more.

Signals per applicant by season: 2024: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2026: 3 · 2027: 4.

See which thoracic surgery programs a signal moves most.

Unsignaled applicants still get interviews

Signaled applicants were interviewed at 30%; those who didn't signal, 22%
Median program's interview rate by signal and applicant type, ERAS 2026 (3 signals)
Did not signalSignaled
0%25%50%75%100%
All applicants
20 programs
30%
MD
20 programs
50%
Intl. graduates
20 programs
0%
Show as table
Did not signalSignaled
All applicants22%30%
MD32%50%
Intl. graduates0%0%
Note: 20 programs reported interview offers and met the AAMC's threshold of 7 invited applicants per PGY-1 position. Each dot is the median program's own rate. A missing applicant type was suppressed by the AAMC (under 50 applicants).
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

At 70% of programs, signaled applicants were interviewed at a higher rate than those who didn’t signal. Applying beyond your signals still pays in thoracic surgery; a signal raises the odds but isn’t required.

These are last season’s rates. Track who is sending thoracic surgery interview invites this season.

International graduates who signaled were rarely interviewed

An MD who signaled a thoracic surgery program was interviewed at 50% of the median program, the ninth lowest of 21 specialties with interview data. The AAMC didn’t report a DO figure (under 50 DO applicants).

An international graduate who signaled (0%) still did worse than an MD who didn’t (32%).

These are outcomes by group, not the effect of belonging to one. The groups differ in exam timing, visa needs and U.S. clinical experience, and none of that is controlled here.

The most common backup is general surgery, chosen by 89%

Also applied to, ERAS 2026Share of applicants
General Surgery (categorical)89%
General Surgery (preliminary)PGY-1 year38%
Vascular Surgery - Integrated18%
Internal Medicine (categorical)14%
Family Medicine8%
Internal Medicine (primary care)8%

Rows marked PGY-1 year are preliminary and transitional programs, which specialties that start at PGY-2 require. Categorical programs in another specialty are the real backup plan.