← ERAS statistics, all specialties
Family Medicine ERAS statistics 2027

Family Medicine Has 15% More Applicants Than Four Years Ago

On the day programs opened ERAS 2027 applications, 10,148 people had applied to family medicine, against 8,815 at the same point of ERAS 2023. Programs interviewed 42% of the applicants who signaled them and 19% of those who didn't.

By Rezumab · Data as of

That is a 15% increase, comparing the same day of each cycle. Of the 20 specialties with at least 300 applicants, 17 grew; family medicine had the 13th-largest increase. Over full seasons, the change from ERAS 2023 to 2026 was +15%. By applicant type, the same-day change since ERAS 2023 was −4% for MDs, −9% for DOs and +35% for international graduates.

Below are five seasons of AAMC ERAS data for family medicine: who applies, how many applications they send, how signals are used and how often programs interviewed applicants who did and didn’t signal them, split by MD, DO and international medical graduate.

Applicants
10,148
3.8% vs. last year
Applications
417,389
8.5% vs. last year
Median apps each
30
0.0% vs. last year
Applicants by type: MD 1,929 (−3.5%) · DO 1,970 (−1.7%) · Intl. 6,249 (−4.5%)
ERAS 2027 so far, against the same day of ERAS 2026

The international-graduate share of applicants rose 6 points

Full-season applicants rose 15% from ERAS 2023 to 2026
Applicants by type, completed ERAS seasons. Anyone who sent the specialty at least one application.
02,5005,0007,50010,000ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026Intl. graduates 8,383DO 2,218MD 2,214
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

In ERAS 2026, 12,815 people applied to family medicine. The pool was 17.3% MD, 17.3% DO and 65.4% international graduates. 30.7% applied to no other specialty, a count that treats required preliminary and transitional years as another specialty.

Applicants are down 3.8% from the same day last year

Applicants fell in two of the last four years
Change in family medicine applicants from the same day a year earlier, by type; last column is all applications
Family Medicine year-over-year change
SeasonAllMDDOIntl. gradsApplications
ERAS 2027so far, vs. same day of 2026−3.8%−3.5%−1.7%−4.5%−8.5%
ERAS 2026vs. 2025+13.5%+2.3%−6.1%+25.8%+11.6%
ERAS 2025vs. 2024+11.7%+1.6%+4.2%+19.8%+0.2%
ERAS 2024vs. 2023−5.6%−3.9%−5.4%−6.5%−18.1%
Note: Same-day counts for every season, so the in-progress year compares fairly. A dash means fewer than 50 applicants in the earlier year, or a season when the specialty was only partly in ERAS.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

The median applicant sends 29 applications, down from 32

Every applicant type is sending fewer applications
Median applications per applicant to family medicine
010203040Signals begin (5)ERAS 2023ERAS 2024ERAS 2025ERAS 2026ERAS 2027Intl. graduates 31DO 30MD 24
Note: ERAS 2027 (hollow markers) is as of September 23, 2026.
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

By type in ERAS 2026: MDs 24, DOs 30, international graduates 30. The middle half of applicants sent between 13 and 50. The overall median is the eighth lowest of 23 specialties covered here.

On the programs’ side, the median family medicine program received 384 applications in ERAS 2026, against 541 in ERAS 2023.

Most applications still arrive without a signal

In ERAS 2027, 99% of family medicine applicants used signals, and the median signaling applicant used 5.

At the median program, 11% of applicants had signaled it, up from 10% in ERAS 2026. The median program received 45 signals; the busiest tenth received 127 or more.

Signals per applicant by season: 2024: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2026: 5 · 2027: 5.

See which family medicine programs a signal moves most.

Unsignaled applicants still get interviews

Signaled applicants were interviewed at 42%; those who didn't signal, 19%
Median program's interview rate by signal and applicant type, ERAS 2026 (5 signals)
Did not signalSignaled
0%25%50%75%100%
All applicants
701 programs
42%
MD
701 programs
78%
DO
701 programs
75%
Intl. graduates
701 programs
12%
Show as table
Did not signalSignaled
All applicants19%42%
MD49%78%
DO45%75%
Intl. graduates4%12%
Note: 701 programs reported interview offers and met the AAMC's threshold of 7 invited applicants per PGY-1 position. Each dot is the median program's own rate. A missing applicant type was suppressed by the AAMC (under 50 applicants).
Source: AAMC ERAS Statistics; Rezumab analysis

At 92% of programs, signaled applicants were interviewed at a higher rate than those who didn’t signal. Applying beyond your signals still pays in family medicine; a signal raises the odds but isn’t required.

These are last season’s rates. Track who is sending family medicine interview invites this season.

A DO's signal returns 96% of what an MD's does; an international graduate's, 15%

An MD who signaled a family medicine program was interviewed at 78% of the median program, the third highest of 21 specialties with interview data. For DOs, family medicine ranks the second most DO-friendly of 16.

An international graduate who signaled (12%) still did worse than an MD who didn’t (49%).

These are outcomes by group, not the effect of belonging to one. The groups differ in exam timing, visa needs and U.S. clinical experience, and none of that is controlled here.

The most common backup is internal medicine, chosen by 57%

Also applied to, ERAS 2026Share of applicants
Internal Medicine (categorical)57%
Internal Medicine (primary care)42%
Internal Medicine (preliminary)PGY-1 year26%
Pediatrics15%
Transitional YearPGY-1 year12%
Psychiatry7%

Rows marked PGY-1 year are preliminary and transitional programs, which specialties that start at PGY-2 require. Categorical programs in another specialty are the real backup plan.