Orthopaedic Surgery·Toledo, OH

University of Toledo

Signal lift14%65%+51 pp with a signal here

Allocate signal →Track an away here25-26 cycle · applicant-level

Step 2 invited

246–269

p10 – p90

Sample N

372

applicants this cycle

This cycle

—

no tracked aways yet

Match rate

1.1%

4 of 118 applicants

01Cohort funnelthis cycle

N = 372

Applied

372

100.0%

Invited

118

31.7%

Class size

1.1%

02Away rotation impactpast cycles

+69pp lift

Non-rotators

31%

113 of 367

Rotators

100%

5 of 5

Interview lift

+69pp

vs not rotating

Of 5 prior-cycle rotators, 100% got an interview vs 30% for the wider applicant pool here. Rotation appears to materially shift interview odds at this program.

No visa sponsorshipCategorical

Your fitUniversity of Toledo Program

Create a free profile to see your personalized fit

Get started

Applicant profile2025 data

What successful applicants at this program look like.

See how competitive you are here

Compare your stats against applicants at University of Toledo Program

Create free account

Contact

Program Director

Christopher Grant Sanford Jr, MD

Email director

Program Coordinator

Kelly Kovacs, BBA

Email coordinator

Program website ↗

Training sites3 hospitals · Toledo

1
University Medical Center (Toledo)
Toledo, OH
Primary
2
Shriners Hospitals for Children (Lexington)
Lexington, KY
Participant
3
Mercy St Vincent Medical Center
Toledo, OH
Participant

Rotator reports3 reports · paraphrased

hands-on

19-20Rotator in 2019/20 described unmatched senior autonomy on the busy trauma service, a productive merger with ProMedica expanding case volume, strong hand training, and chill resident/faculty culture. Research was encouraged but not pressured. Sites were spread across UTMC and Toledo Hospital.
18-19Rotator in 2018/19 described daily chairman-led OITE review sessions, a strong hand subspecialty, a mentorship operative model, a new sim center, and a peds rotation at Shriners in Kentucky with housing provided. Location was again noted as a drawback.
14-15Rotator in 2014/15 described a solid program with friendly residents, welcoming faculty, and new facilities. Location was noted as a drawback, and fellowship placement was described as reasonable.

Paraphrased from rotator survey responses. Names and identifying details removed.

Score rangesinvited cohort

USMLE Step 2 CK246 – 269

180205230255280

Level 2 CE data not available

Interview rates

US MD

40%

US DO

US IMG

Non-US IMG

Applicant origin