Orthopaedic Surgery·Chicago, IL

Rush University Medical Center

Signal lift3%30%+27 pp with a signal here
Allocate signal →Track an away here22-26 pooled · applicant-level
Step 2 invited
p10 – p90
Sample N
362
applicant rows
This cycle
no tracked aways yet
Match rate
1.7%
6 of 362 matched
01Cohort funnel2022-26 pooled · applicant-level
N = 362
Applied
362
100.0%
Invited
69
19.1%
Matched
6
1.7%

Steepest cliff: invite → match (91% of invitees did not match here). Interview prep and ranking strategy carry the weight.

02Away rotation impact
+81pp lift
Non-rotators
5%
30 of 665
Rotators
86%
30 of 35
Interview lift
+81pp
vs not rotating

Rotators got interviewed at 85%, vs 4% for everyone else. If you can secure a rotation here, you've effectively secured the interview.

No visa sponsorshipCategorical
Your fitRush University Medical Center Program

Create a free profile to see your personalized fit

Get started
Applicant profile2025 data

What successful applicants at this program look like.

See how competitive you are here

Compare your stats against applicants at Rush University Medical Center Program

Create free account
Contact
MK
Program Director
Monica Kogan, MD
Email director
AO
Program Coordinator
Adriana Ohl, MBA
Email coordinator
Training sites6 hospitals
  • 1
    Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, IL
    Primary
  • 2
    Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    Chicago, IL
    Participant
  • 3
    Loyola University Medical Center
    Maywood, IL
    Participant
  • 4
    Rush Oak Park Hospital
    Oak Park, IL
    Participant
  • 5
    OSF St Anthony Medical Center
    Rockford, IL
    Participant
  • 6
    John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County
    Chicago, IL
    Participant
Rotator reports15 reports · paraphrased
Rush University
mixed hands-on
  • 23-24Details withheld for this cycle.
  • 22-23Rotator in 2022/23 described a research-heavy academic program with 4-week service rotations and accessible letters of recommendation. Rotator raised concerns about operative skills of senior residents observed and limited hands-on autonomy across services.
  • 19-20Two rotators in 2019/20 described high case volume, strong research infrastructure, and a supportive PD. Rotators noted the rotation was relatively hands-off for students but senior residents appeared to start cases independently and OR turnover was fast.
  • 18-19Three rotators in 2018/19 described strong research opportunities and happy residents. Rotators noted operative experience varied by service, some services felt fellow-heavy, and trauma was lighter with off-site rotations at Cook County, Loyola, and Rockford.
  • 17-18Two rotators in 2017/18 described a well-regarded academic program with strong leadership, added peds and trauma rotations, and a highly competitive fellowship match list. Rotators noted heavy fellow presence and recommended the program highly.
  • 16-17Two rotators in 2016/17 described a private-academic mentorship model with strong research and attending-led didactics. Rotators noted heavy fellow presence, back-loaded trauma via Cook County and Rockford, and resident-friendly lifestyle outside PGY2.
  • 15-16Two rotators in 2015/16 described a well-regarded academic program with abundant research opportunities, a light call schedule, and a strong fellowship match list. Rotators noted the operative volume was slightly lower than at heavier trauma programs.
  • 14-15Rotator in 2014/15 described a strong academic program with high research output, well-regarded fellowship placements, and happy residents. Rotator noted lighter trauma exposure and mixed rumors about operative experience that were not personally verified.
Rush
mostly shadow
  • 24-25Rotator in 2024/25 described a service-based 4-week rotation with close-knit residents, strong didactics, high-volume clinics, and a program director who met with rotators weekly. Rotator noted heavy fellow presence on sports and joints, frequent 2nd/3rd scrubbing, and limited trauma call access at Cook County that cycle.

Paraphrased from rotator survey responses. Names and identifying details removed.

Score rangesinvited cohort

Step 2 CK data not available

Level 2 CE data not available

Interview rates
US MD
0%
US DO
0%
US IMG
0%
Non-US IMG
0%
Interview prepOrthopaedic Surgery
specialtyWhy orthopaedics over general surgery?★ common
clinicalDescribe an orthopaedic case that was memorable to you.★ common
specialtyWhat subspecialty are you considering? (Sports, spine, trauma, hand, joints)★ common
behavioralHow do you maintain work-life balance in a surgical specialty?
clinicalTell me about your surgical experience.★ common
personalTell me about yourself.★ common
specialtyWhy did you choose this specialty?★ common
programWhy are you interested in our program?★ common
behavioralWhat are your strengths and weaknesses?★ common
personalWhere do you see yourself in 5-10 years?★ common
Community resourcesOrthopaedic Surgery · 25-26
Save this program

Add Rush University Medical Center to your list

Build a personal match list. Compare programs side-by-side, see how your timing stacks against peers, and get notified when peers hear back.

Next

Calculate your match probability for Orthopaedic Surgery.

See how your profile compares across all programs.

Open calculator →

Data from NRMP 2025 Residency Explorer. Not medical advice. © 2026 Rezumab LLC.